Jorja

TSLAX is trading near $398, but the bigger question is whether this recovery can regain momentum after a sharp retreat from its previous highs. The token tracks Tesla’s share price, and the latest market data shows a 24-hour range of roughly $398–$412. That puts price back near the lower end of the range, where buyers need to show that demand is still there rather than allowing another leg down. What makes this setup different from a regular crypto trade is the underlying driver. Tesla’s stock performance, earnings expectations, and investor appetite for growth companies can matter more than typical crypto catalysts. TSLAX also trades on blockchain markets, so liquidity and token-market conditions can create differences from the underlying equity market. The token previously reached around $497, leaving it well below its peak. That pullback makes the $395–$400 area important to watch. Holding above it could open a recovery toward $412, while a sustained move above $420 would give buyers a stronger signal. If $395 breaks, the next downside area to monitor is around $385. For now, I’m watching whether TSLAX can stabilize near support before attempting another move higher. A tokenized stock can offer blockchain-based exposure to Tesla’s price, but it is not the same as holding Tesla shares directly, and the structure and rights depend on the issuer’s terms. $TSLAXUSDT #ByXIMPACT

WLD is trading near $0.43 after a sharp weekly decline, and the important question now is whether this area can attract genuine buyers or simply becomes another pause before the next leg down. What caught my attention is the supply pressure. World’s latest market data shows roughly 3.7 billion WLD circulating against a maximum supply of 10 billion. That means a large portion of the eventual supply is still outside circulation, making future releases an important factor whenever demand starts weakening. The next scheduled unlock is expected on November 24, with around 100 million WLD due to become available. At the current price, that represents roughly $43 million in potential supply. An unlock does not automatically mean those tokens will be sold, but it creates another supply event the market has to absorb. The fundamental story is still interesting. World is building around digital identity, proof of human verification and World Chain, which could become more relevant as AI-generated activity increases online. But adoption of the network and actual demand for WLD are two different things; growth in identity verification does not automatically translate into buying pressure for the token. On the chart, $0.425–$0.430 is the immediate support zone. If buyers defend it and reclaim $0.45, a recovery toward $0.48–$0.50 becomes possible. A sustained break above $0.50 would be a stronger sign that momentum is improving. If $0.425 fails, however, WLD could revisit the $0.40 area, with further downside possible if selling accelerates. For now, I would not rush to call a bottom. WLD has a compelling identity-and-AI narrative, but the combination of weak price action and continuing supply releases means buyers need to prove themselves before the setup becomes convincing. $WLDUSDT #ByXIMPACT

NEAR is bouncing around $4.60, but the bigger question is whether this move has enough strength to reverse the recent weakness or is just another relief rally. What caught my attention is the gap between NEAR’s ecosystem growth and its price performance. NEAR Intents has reportedly processed more than $10 billion in Q3 volume and generated over $52 million in year-to-date fees. That points to real activity beyond speculation, although platform growth does not automatically translate into demand for the NEAR token. There’s also a fresh development on the trading side: NEAR is expanding confidential perpetual markets linked to major private-company names, including Anthropic and Jio Platforms. This could attract more activity to its ecosystem, but the lasting impact will depend on actual usage and how much value flows back to the network. The chart still needs to prove itself. NEAR is trading near $4.60 after a sharp pullback, with $4.30–$4.40 acting as the key support zone. Holding this area could allow buyers to challenge $4.78, while a clean break above $5.00 would be a stronger sign that momentum is returning. If $4.30 gives way, the recovery setup weakens and $3.95 becomes the next downside area to watch. For now, I’m watching whether NEAR can turn growing ecosystem activity into sustained buying. The fundamentals are getting more interesting, but price still needs to confirm that the market is ready to reward them. $NEARUSDT #ByXIMPACT

JST is trading near $0.139, but the development worth watching is not just the price JUST has changed how its buyback-and-burn mechanism is funded. The token has been relatively steady over the past week, while the bigger story is unfolding across the TRON DeFi ecosystem. On October 17, JUST completed another major burn, removing approximately 170.7 million JST. Across five rounds, about 1.88 billion tokens have reportedly been burned. That is a meaningful reduction in supply, but the next question is whether ongoing demand can support the price after the initial excitement fades. The new buyback framework is particularly interesting. Funding is being expanded beyond JustLend to include revenue from USDD and GasFree, while a $50 million treasury reserve floor is intended to protect operating capital. An additional $20.34 million in surplus funds has been earmarked for phased buybacks. If executed as described, this gives JST a broader potential link to activity across JUST’s products rather than relying on a single revenue source. Still, burns do not automatically create a price rally. Execution, actual product revenue, liquidity and wider TRON market conditions will determine whether this translates into sustained buying pressure. On the chart, $0.138–$0.139 is the immediate area to watch. Holding above it could open another test of $0.141–$0.145. A convincing break above that range would improve the short-term structure, while losing $0.138 could bring $0.135 into focus. For now, JST has a more interesting fundamental story than a simple token-burn headline. I’m watching whether the upgraded mechanism and real market demand can work together because that is what could make this change matter beyond the announcement. $JSTUSDT #ByXIMPACT

PENGU is bouncing around $0.0078, but the part I’m watching is whether this recovery can finally break the pattern of lower highs that has weighed on the token over the past month. The price is up roughly 5–6% over the last 24 hours, with market capitalization near $490 million and trading volume picking up. Yet PENGU remains down more than 20% over the past 30 days. That contrast matters: buyers are returning for a short-term move, but the broader trend still needs confirmation. There’s also a development worth keeping on the radar. PENGU became tradable through SoFi’s banking app in October, potentially expanding access to a much wider audience. For a community-driven token like Pudgy Penguins, broader distribution can help, but lasting demand depends on whether that attention translates into sustained buying rather than a temporary spike. Supply is another factor. Around 62.86 billion PENGU are circulating out of a maximum 88.89 billion. The next scheduled unlock is November 17, when approximately 723 million tokens are due to be released. That is close to 1% of the current circulating supply, so the market’s reaction to future supply will matter. On the chart, $0.0076–$0.0077 is the first support zone. Holding above it could give buyers another attempt at $0.00785–$0.0080. A convincing breakout above $0.0080 would improve the structure and put $0.0084 into focus. If price loses $0.0074, however, the recovery could weaken and bring the $0.0070 area back into play. For now, PENGU is showing signs of life, but I wouldn’t confuse a one-day bounce with a trend reversal. The real signal will be whether buyers can reclaim resistance while keeping volume strong. $PENGUUSDT #ByXIMPACT

XAN is up more than 65% in 24 hours, but I’m not treating this move as a confirmed reversal just yet. After spending weeks under pressure, Anoma is seeing a sudden burst of buying and the important question is whether demand can survive the next wave of selling. At around $0.0127, XAN has a market cap near $25.5M. The sharp move is bringing attention back to Anoma’s intent-centric design, which aims to let users express the outcome they want while competing solvers work out how to execute it. The idea is to make transactions across different applications and networks feel less fragmented. But the chart has a warning: XAN previously traded above $0.25, so it remains far below its earlier peak. A big percentage bounce from depressed levels can attract momentum traders without proving that long-term demand has returned. Supply is another factor. XAN has a 10B maximum supply, and an unlock is scheduled for October 29. That could add selling pressure just as traders assess this rally, so volume and price reaction around the event matter. On the chart, $0.0120–$0.0122 is the first area I’d watch for support. Holding it could keep the recovery alive, while a sustained move above $0.0130–$0.0132 would strengthen the short-term structure. If price loses $0.0120, the bounce could cool quickly. For now, XAN has momentum, but momentum alone is not confirmation. I’d rather see buyers defend support and clear resistance before treating this as the start of a lasting trend change. $XANUSDT #ByXIMPACT

DOT is fighting to stay above the $1 mark, and this is where the chart becomes more important than the usual Polkadot recovery narrative. After seven consecutive daily declines, the latest bounce is still small compared with the selling pressure that brought price down from $1.19. What makes this move interesting is that Polkadot has made meaningful changes beneath the surface. Annual DOT issuance was reduced from 120 million to 55 million in March, alongside a long-term supply cap of 2.1 billion DOT. That improves the supply outlook, but lower issuance alone cannot reverse a market that is still dominated by sellers. There is also a new ecosystem development worth watching: dotUSD, Polkadot’s protocol-owned dollar-pegged stablecoin, was approved by governance and went live on October 8. If stablecoin liquidity and activity grow on Asset Hub, that could create more practical reasons to use the network. The real test is whether usage follows the launch rather than attention fading after the announcement. On the chart, $0.98–$1.00 is the immediate support zone after DOT briefly slipped below a dollar. Holding this area and reclaiming $1.05–$1.08 would be the first sign that buyers are regaining control. A stronger move above $1.11 could improve the short-term structure. But if DOT loses $0.98 decisively, the recovery attempt weakens and fresh lows become a risk. For now, I’m watching the $1 level closely. Polkadot’s supply changes and new stablecoin are constructive developments, but DOT needs to prove that buyers are willing to defend this price zone before I treat the bounce as a genuine trend shift. $DOTUSDT #ByXIMPACT

DOOD is showing exactly the kind of volatility that can trap late buyers. After surging from around $0.0014 to above $0.0028, the token has pulled back sharply, and now the question is whether this is a healthy reset or the start of another sell-off. What stands out is the volume behind the move. DOOD’s 24-hour trading activity surged into the tens of millions of dollars, while its market cap remains relatively small at around $16–17 million. That combination can create fast price swings in both directions, especially when leveraged traders enter the picture. Doodles is trying to build beyond its NFT origins through digital storytelling, community experiences and its DreamNet ecosystem. That gives the project a broader vision, but the token still needs sustained demand to turn that narrative into lasting value. Supply is another factor I wouldn’t ignore. DOOD has a maximum supply of 10 billion tokens, with around 7.8 billion reported in circulation. The next scheduled unlock is November 9, releasing roughly 61.1 million tokens. That is a relatively small portion of total supply, but market sentiment will determine whether traders absorb it comfortably. On the chart, $0.00200–$0.00205 is the first area I’m watching for support. Holding it could open a recovery toward $0.00230–$0.00245. A clean break above that range would bring $0.00275 back into focus. If $0.00200 fails, however, the recent rebound becomes much less convincing, with $0.00185 and $0.00150 as downside areas to watch. For now, I’m not chasing the spike. DOOD has attracted serious short-term attention, but the next move depends on whether buyers can defend support and build a base rather than simply repeat another volatility-driven pump. $DOODUSDT #ByXIMPACT

B3 is trading near $0.000649, but the bigger concern right now is not just price weakness it’s the pressure building around liquidity and exchange access. The token has slipped from the $0.00077 area seen last week toward the $0.00064–$0.00065 range. What makes this move more important is that B3 is already trading roughly 96% below its February 2025 all-time high. Buyers are trying to stabilize the price, but there is still no clear sign of a sustained recovery. B3 is built around onchain gaming, with an ecosystem designed to let developers launch games and appchains connected to Base. The token supports staking, governance and ecosystem participation. That gives the project a clear direction, but long-term demand still depends on whether real gaming activity translates into meaningful token usage. The supply side also deserves attention. B3 has a maximum supply of 100 billion tokens, with roughly 46.43 billion currently circulating. That leaves a substantial portion outside circulation, making vesting and future releases important factors for holders. There is another risk traders should not ignore: KuCoin announced B3’s delisting effective October 8, with withdrawals scheduled to remain available until November 9. Reduced exchange access can affect liquidity and make sharp moves more likely. On the chart, $0.000634–$0.000640 is the immediate support zone. Holding it could open a recovery toward $0.000675–$0.000700. A stronger move above $0.000700 would improve the short-term structure, while a decisive break below $0.000634 could expose the $0.000600 area and then $0.000530. For now, I’d rather see B3 reclaim resistance with stronger volume than chase a small bounce. The gaming ecosystem has a long-term thesis, but price needs to show that buyers are returning before the setup becomes convincing. $B3USDT #ByXIMPACT

HAEDAL is making a sharp move today, but the part I’m watching is how much of this rally is backed by real spot demand versus leveraged trading. The token has climbed roughly 35–38% in 24 hours, trading near $0.0297 after touching $0.0314. Volume has surged toward $98 million, an unusually large figure relative to its roughly $16 million market cap. That tells me attention has returned quickly, but it also means volatility and liquidation risk are elevated. The underlying project is worth watching beyond the price spike. Haedal is a liquid-staking protocol built on Sui, allowing users to stake SUI and receive liquid-staking tokens that can remain active across DeFi. Its broader product direction includes lending vaults and market-making infrastructure, so the long-term question is whether product usage and fee generation can grow alongside speculation. There is a supply risk traders should not ignore: 1 billion HAEDAL is the maximum supply, while the next scheduled unlock is October 29, releasing about 13.75 million tokens. That is roughly 1.4% of total supply, arriving immediately after this sharp rally. It does not guarantee selling, but it could add pressure if early buyers start taking profits. On the chart, $0.028–$0.029 is the first area I’d watch for support. Holding it could allow another test of $0.0315–$0.034. If momentum fades and $0.028 breaks, the $0.026 area becomes important; below that, the recent breakout would look much weaker. For now, I wouldn’t chase a vertical candle. HAEDAL has momentum, but the next test is whether buyers can defend the breakout while the market absorbs profit-taking and the upcoming unlock. $HAEDALUSDT #ByXIMPACT

ATOM is trying to stabilize near $1.63, but the bigger concern is that this recovery is happening while Cosmos is facing fresh questions about ecosystem growth. The token is still trading close to the lower end of its recent range, with the $1.60 area acting as an important line for buyers. What makes this move interesting is the timing: Cosmos Hub has approved its Gaia v29 upgrade, aimed at removing deprecated code and improving core dependencies. That is useful infrastructure work, but a cleaner protocol does not automatically create more demand for ATOM. There is also a development traders should not ignore. Akash Network has opened a proposal to migrate from Cosmos to Solana, raising questions about competition between ecosystems and where future activity will concentrate. One project’s proposal does not define the entire Cosmos ecosystem, but it does put pressure on the narrative that Cosmos will keep attracting major applications. Token supply is another factor. ATOM has ongoing inflation through staking rewards, so demand needs to absorb newly issued tokens over time. Staking can help secure the network, but it does not remove inflationary pressure by itself. On the chart, $1.60–$1.61 is the immediate support zone. Holding it could allow a recovery toward $1.65–$1.69. A convincing move above $1.69 would improve the structure, while a decisive break below $1.60 could expose $1.56 and then $1.47. For now, I’m watching whether ATOM can defend support while the ecosystem works through these competing signals. The upgrade is a positive technical step, but stronger price action will need buyers not just development headlines. $ATOMUSDT #ByXIMPACT

VVV is trading around $25 after pulling back from its recent highs, and the interesting part is that Venice is cutting token emissions while its AI business continues to attract attention. The question is whether real usage can support the token after the rally. On October 1, annual emissions fell from 2.5 million VVV to 2 million. That is a meaningful reduction in new supply, but it does not automatically make VVV deflationary. Venice also buys and burns tokens using part of its subscription and API-credit revenue, so the balance between emissions and actual burns is what matters. The utility is more concrete than a typical AI-token narrative. Staking VVV earns rewards, while locking staked VVV allows holders to mint DIEM, which provides $1 of daily Venice API credit per token when staked. That creates a link between demand for private AI inference and the token ecosystem, although the amount of value reaching VVV holders still depends on the platform’s burn policy and token economics. Price action needs attention too. VVV recently traded near $28 before retreating toward $24–$25, with the latest session showing a range around $24.40–$26.30. The $24–$24.50 zone is the first area I’d watch for buyers to defend. Holding it and reclaiming $26.30 could open another test of $27.50–$28. A decisive break below $24 would weaken the structure and put the $22–$23 area back in focus. For me, VVV is a combination of an AI-infrastructure play and a token-supply story. Lower emissions help, but sustained demand and verifiable burns matter more than the word “deflationary.” I’d want to see price reclaim resistance before treating this pullback as finished. $VVVUSDT #ByXIMPACT

CRCLX is facing another test near $80, and the interesting part is how quickly the tokenized Circle stock has pulled back after trading above $90 earlier this month. Recent price data shows CRCLX falling from around $88.86 on October 21 to roughly $80.31 on October 26, with trading volume reaching about $32.6 million during that decline. That combination points to meaningful selling pressure, not just a quiet dip. But CRCLX needs to be understood differently from a regular crypto token. It tracks Circle Internet Group, the company behind USDC, and is designed to provide tokenized exposure to its shares. Circle’s business is closely tied to stablecoin adoption, payment infrastructure and the broader growth of on-chain finance. If USDC usage expands, that can strengthen the business narrative, but it does not guarantee that CRCLX will rise in the short term. There is also an important distinction: CRCLX is a tokenized stock tracker, not direct ownership of Circle shares. Holders do not receive the usual shareholder voting rights, and token-market liquidity can differ from the underlying stock market. On the chart, $79–$80 is the immediate support zone. If buyers defend it and reclaim $84–$85, the recovery could extend toward $88. A sustained move above $90 would improve the short-term structure. However, a decisive break below $79 could expose the $75–$76 area. For now, I’m watching whether CRCLX can stabilize around $80. The long-term stablecoin story remains relevant, but the immediate signal is whether buyers can absorb the selling pressure and rebuild momentum.$CRCLXUSDT #ByXIMPACT

LTC is trading near $57 after losing more than 20% over the past month, and the worrying part is that Litecoin has fallen much harder than Bitcoin during the same period. What stands out is the lack of fresh demand to absorb the selling. U.S. spot Litecoin ETFs have attracted roughly $16.9M in cumulative net inflows, but recent daily flows have largely stalled. That is a small pool of institutional demand for an asset with a market cap around $4.5B, so the ETF story alone is not providing enough support. The supply side is relatively straightforward: Litecoin has a maximum supply of 84 million LTC, and its next halving is expected around mid-2027. But that event is still months away. Right now, market liquidity and Bitcoin’s direction are likely to matter more than a future reduction in mining rewards. On the chart, $55–$56 is the immediate support zone. Holding it could allow a recovery toward $58.80–$60, where sellers may return. A sustained reclaim of $61.30 would be a more convincing sign that momentum is improving. If $55 breaks decisively, the next major area to watch is near $52, around the 200-day moving average. Losing that level would put the August low near $44 back into focus. For now, I’m treating LTC as a recovery setup that still needs proof. The long-term supply story remains clear, but price needs stronger demand and a reclaim of key resistance before the bullish case becomes convincing. $LTCUSDT #ByXIMPACT

TIA is trading near $0.54, and the part I’m watching isn’t just the price weakness it’s whether Celestia can turn its data-availability technology into stronger demand for the token. Celestia takes a different approach to blockchain infrastructure. Instead of forcing every chain to handle execution and data availability together, it lets rollups publish their data separately. Developers pay TIA to post data, while the token also secures the network through staking. The technology has a clear purpose, but adoption only becomes a stronger investment case when usage translates into sustained demand. The supply side is worth watching too. Around 986 million TIA are circulating, and the next scheduled community unlock is expected to release roughly 5.58 million tokens on October 31. That is about 0.6% of total supply not automatically bearish, but enough to matter if buyers are already struggling to absorb selling pressure. There’s also a longer-term change in TIA’s favor: network inflation has been reduced from its original 8% rate toward a 1.5% long-term floor. Lower issuance can ease dilution, although it cannot create demand by itself. On the chart, $0.52–$0.54 is the immediate support area. Holding this zone could open a recovery toward $0.57–$0.60. A stronger move above $0.60 would improve the structure, while a decisive breakdown below $0.52 could expose the $0.48 region. For now, TIA is a test of fundamentals versus market pressure. Celestia’s modular design gives it a real use case, but I want to see price stabilize and network demand strengthen before treating this level as a confirmed reversal. $TIAUSDT #ByXIMPACT

ENJ is trying to stabilize near $0.0255 after a bounce from the $0.0248 area, but the recovery is still small compared with the damage from its longer-term decline. The question now is whether buyers are building a base or simply reacting to short-term support. What makes this setup interesting is the timing. Enjin’s Fort Canning upgrade is approaching, with the Relaychain upgrade planned for November 9 and the Matrixchain upgrade for November 16, subject to governance approval. The changes are designed to expand NFT functionality, introduce new governance features and make in-game assets more flexible. That gives ENJ a concrete development catalyst, but adoption will matter more than the announcement itself. Supply is another factor worth watching. Around 2.01 billion ENJ are already circulating out of roughly 2.03 billion total supply, so the token is close to fully distributed. That limits the impact of large future unlocks, although it does not automatically create buying demand. On the chart, $0.0248–$0.0250 is the immediate support zone. Holding it could allow ENJ to challenge $0.0257–$0.0260. A sustained move above that area would improve the short-term structure, while losing $0.0248 could bring $0.0242 back into focus. For now, ENJ has a real development milestone ahead, but the price still needs to confirm the story. I’d watch for stronger volume and a clean break above resistance before treating this bounce as the start of a larger recovery. $ENJUSDT #ByXIMPACT

STRK is trying to stabilize near $0.046 after a brutal correction, but the bigger question is whether buyers are returning for the technology or simply trading the next narrative. Starknet recently attracted attention after a governance vote supported researching a move toward an independent, post-quantum Layer 1. That is a significant strategic discussion, but it is still a research step—not a confirmed migration. The market has already shown how quickly it can price in expectations before the actual network changes arrive. The token’s supply picture adds another challenge. Around 7.59 billion STRK are circulating, and the next scheduled unlock is expected to release 127 million tokens on November 15. That is roughly 1.7% of the current circulating supply, so traders have a real reason to watch how demand behaves ahead of the event. On the chart, STRK is trading around $0.046–$0.047 after recently falling close to its August low near $0.022. The $0.044–$0.045 area is the first support zone to monitor. Holding it could open a recovery toward $0.050 and then $0.055. A sustained break above $0.055 would provide stronger evidence that buyers are regaining control. If $0.044 fails, however, the recovery could lose momentum and sellers may target lower support levels again. For now, I’m watching whether STRK can build a base instead of producing another short-lived bounce. The post-quantum direction is an interesting long-term story, but token unlocks and actual network adoption will matter more than the headline alone. $STRKUSDT #ByXIMPACT

XLM is showing a sharp recovery today, gaining around 10% in 24 hours while much of the broader market remains under pressure. But after weeks of weakness, the key question is whether this move can turn into a genuine trend reversal or simply another relief bounce. What makes this move interesting is that Stellar’s fundamentals have been developing even as its price struggled. The network’s tokenized real-world asset market has approached $4 billion, while institutional activity has expanded through projects involving tokenized funds, Treasury-backed collateral and cross-border payments. One development worth watching is Stellar’s upcoming Bell upgrade. The proposal introduces post-quantum signature verification for smart contracts, with a testnet validator vote scheduled for November 3 and a mainnet vote planned for November 23. It could strengthen the network’s long-term security capabilities, although the upgrade itself does not guarantee additional demand for XLM. There is an important distinction here: more assets and payments on Stellar do not automatically translate into higher XLM demand. The token’s actual value depends on network usage, liquidity needs and whether that activity creates sustained buying pressure. On the chart, $0.168–$0.170 is the immediate area to watch. Holding above this zone could help buyers challenge $0.1735, followed by $0.178–$0.180. A sustained move above that range would make the recovery more convincing. If XLM loses $0.167, however, the bounce could weaken quickly, with $0.162 becoming the next downside area to monitor. For now, I’m watching whether this sudden strength brings follow-through. Stellar’s institutional story is getting more interesting, but XLM still needs to turn that progress into stronger price structure before I would call this a confirmed reversal. $XLMUSDT #ByXIMPACT

NEAR is trading around $4.45 after slipping nearly 17% over the past month, but there’s an interesting disconnect here: price is weakening while the network’s revenue and token-value capture are becoming more meaningful. NEAR Intents crossed $32 billion in cumulative transaction volume during Q3, generated more than $52 million in cumulative fees, and directed over $8 million toward NEAR buybacks. That matters because the story is no longer just about cross-chain technology; the bigger question is whether real usage can translate into sustained demand for $NEAR. There’s another catalyst traders shouldn’t ignore. A governance proposal is seeking to reduce annual token issuance from 2.5% to 1.6%, with voting scheduled to close on November 2. If approved and implemented by validators, it could reduce future supply growth. But it is still a proposal, not a completed change, and lower issuance would also mean lower staking rewards. Technically, $4.39–$4.45 is the immediate support area. Holding this zone could open a recovery toward $4.60–$4.75. A stronger reclaim of $5.00 would improve the short-term structure, while a decisive break below $4.39 could expose further downside. For now, I’m watching whether buyers defend support while Intents activity continues to grow. NEAR has a stronger value-capture story than it did earlier this year, but the market still needs to prove that fundamentals can overcome the current selling pressure.$NEARUSDT #ByXIMPACT

ETH is struggling to hold the $2,350 area, and the latest pullback is showing that buyers still haven’t regained control. What makes this move important is that Ethereum is facing selling pressure even as a large share of its supply remains locked in staking. ETH is trading near $2,320, down roughly 3.8% over seven days and around 14% over the past month. The market is no longer dealing with just a small correction; price has been making lower highs, while attempts to recover continue to face resistance. One detail worth watching is institutional demand. U.S. spot ETH ETFs have experienced significant outflows during October, adding pressure while traders reduce risk ahead of the Federal Reserve decision. At the same time, around 43.8 million ETH nearly 36% of supply was staked at the end of September. That reduces the readily available trading supply, but it cannot protect price when demand weakens. The key zone now is $2,295–$2,300. If buyers defend it and ETH reclaims $2,350–$2,400, a recovery toward $2,460 becomes possible. But a decisive break below $2,295 could open the way toward $2,276 and then $2,220. For now, I’m watching whether ETH can reclaim $2,400 rather than trying to catch every dip. Staking remains a long-term strength, but near-term price direction will depend on whether buyers return and selling pressure starts to ease.$ETHUSDT #ByXIMPACT